The Manosphere Isn't a Movement
· business
The Multibillion-Dollar Grift Economy Behind the Manosphere
The notion that a “manosphere” is driving the cultural and economic anxieties of young men has become a convenient narrative to explain everything from their rising support for right-wing politicians to their fascination with get-rich-quick schemes. However, a recent study suggests that this movement is not a grassroots rebellion but rather a sophisticated marketing machine preying on vulnerable young men.
The report “The Grift Economy: How Young Men Are Being Sold Fake Belonging and Fake Wealth Online” paints a disturbing picture of how the digital ecosystem has created a multibillion-dollar industry exploiting men’s insecurities. By framing economic anxiety as a personal attack on masculinity, this industry converts genuine concerns into resentment and anger towards women, immigrants, and other perceived enemies. Researchers estimate that top influencers in this space can earn anywhere from $1 million to $10 million annually, with some making up to $184 million per year.
The study’s findings are not surprising given the way online platforms amplify and monetize extremist views. Social media companies take a cut of the profits generated by masculinity influencers who push toxic content while generating controversy and conflict. The report highlights how these platforms reward creators for promoting unhealthy behaviors, such as looksmaxxing, which targets men’s negative body image.
The authors draw a parallel between this material and pro-eating-disorder content that has been widely condemned online. While platforms have taken action against the latter, they have not pursued similar enforcement against users reinforcing men’s negative body image. This double standard is particularly egregious given the devastating impact of these ideologies on young men.
The rise of influencers like Andrew Tate and Clavicular illustrates how outrage fuels clicks that ultimately line the pockets of masculinity gurus. These individuals use their platforms to peddle get-rich-quick schemes, supplements, and coaching programs to desperate young men. Researchers estimate that top streamers can earn up to $50,000 per hour, while others command speaking fees upwards of $200,000.
The business model behind this industry is built on exploiting men’s vulnerabilities and selling them fake solutions. This is not a movement but a pyramid scheme preying on the most vulnerable members of society. The fact that these influencers amass such wealth from their toxic ideologies raises important questions about the role of social media in perpetuating harm.
The report’s authors urge policymakers to take action against this multibillion-dollar grift economy. They argue that platforms must do more to regulate and enforce guidelines around potentially harmful content, particularly when it comes to looksmaxxing and other forms of men’s toxic body image. This requires a fundamental shift in the way we approach online regulation, prioritizing the protection of vulnerable individuals over the profits of big tech.
The multibillion-dollar industry behind the manosphere is built on lies, resentment, and anger. It preys on the most vulnerable members of society while lining the pockets of masculinity gurus. Policymakers and platforms must take action against this toxic industry, prioritizing the protection of young men and women over the profits of big tech. If we fail to address this problem, we risk creating a generation of young men who are more vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation than ever before.
Reader Views
- TNThe Newsroom Desk · editorial
The report's findings on the manosphere's true nature as a multibillion-dollar grift economy raise questions about the complicity of social media platforms in perpetuating this toxic industry. While the study highlights the alarming profits of top influencers, it's equally disturbing to consider how these platforms' algorithms reward creators for promoting extremist views and unhealthy behaviors. A crucial aspect that deserves closer examination is the role of advertising in fueling this ecosystem - are major brands knowingly or unknowingly supporting content that preys on vulnerable young men?
- DHDr. Helen V. · economist
The report's findings are a stark reminder of how online marketeers exploit young men's insecurities for profit. However, it's equally important to examine the economic incentives driving this phenomenon. The notion that influencers can rake in tens of millions annually by peddling toxic masculinity raises questions about who benefits from these schemes. Are we merely witnessing a sophisticated grift economy or is there a more insidious power dynamic at play?
- MTMarcus T. · small-business owner
The real scandal here isn't just the profiteering from young men's insecurities, but how the manosphere is corroding our public discourse by radicalizing economic anxiety into a zero-sum game of masculinity. This report should prompt social media platforms to reconsider their business model: if they're going to profit from hate speech and body shaming, can't they at least do some basic fact-checking on the pseudoscience being peddled?