"While it's true that past Olympic bids in the UK have been marred by cost overruns, the key difference this time is the region's willingness to learn from those mistakes and think outside the box. The north's existing infrastructure, particularly in Manchester, provides a solid foundation for a bid, but what's often overlooked is the impact on local businesses. Hosting the Olympics would create a huge influx of visitors, many of whom will be staying longer than just a few days. This could be a major boost to the regional economy, providing opportunities for small firms like mine to benefit from increased trade and tourism."

The north of England's Olympic bid is often seen as a long shot, but I believe it's a gamble worth taking. The region has a unique opportunity to showcase its existing infrastructure and potential for growth, particularly in cities like Manchester with a proven track record of hosting major events. However, what's often overlooked is the significant economic benefits that come not just from the Games themselves, but from the sustained investment and urban regeneration that follows. If managed correctly, this bid could be a game-changer for the north, driving growth and development that lasts long after the final medal ceremony.

The north's Olympic bid is a risk worth taking, but one that requires careful planning and execution. While Manchester's existing infrastructure is a major plus, the region's ability to finance and deliver new facilities in time for the Games remains uncertain. A key challenge will be securing public sector investment and private funding to upgrade outdated athletics facilities, without adding undue burden to local taxpayers or increasing costs. The success of this bid hinges on UK Sport's ability to create a robust financial plan that balances ambition with fiscal responsibility.